01
One link — the whole team
Participants take the tests with a personal code: no accounts, passwords, or mass emails. Five methodologies — from MBTI and Big Five to the associative Jung16 — in four languages.
Sparta Tests
Sparta Tests — team diagnostics and assembly
Teams don’t breakbecause of people —they break over combinations.
Sparta turns psychological test results into a map of the relationships inside a team: who amplifies whom, where friction builds up, and which combinations give the lineup its footing. The final word stays with the specialist: every profile can be confirmed by an expert conclusion.
Typology profile
source and confidence — explicit
16×16 matrix
256 relationship pairs
Assembly plan
coverage and remainder — explicit
MBTI · 70 questions, Big Five · IPIP-NEO-120, Jung16 · association pyramid, Socionics screening, 16×16 intertype relations matrix, Group morphology, Auto assembly plans, AI explanations of results, 4 interface languages
Sound familiar?
“Something is off” — but what exactly?
conflict linksafter reassembly
- Meetings stall, decisions hang in the air
- A conflict smolders with no visible cause
- Strong people — weak group
- New lineup — same problems
- Team building helps for exactly a week
Sparta looks for the cause in combinations, not in people: it shows exactly which links create friction — and which lineup changes are worth testing.
How it works
From “what’s wrong with the team?” to an action plan — four steps
01020304
02
From answers to a profile
Results are normalized into a typology profile that states its source and confidence. The final word stays with the expert: automation does not replace the specialist.
03
Lineups built for the task
The 16×16 relations matrix, group morphology, and automatic assembly plans: the system proposes quartet plans for the goal — discussion, brainstorming, execution, or decision-making — in three strategies.
04
Clear explanations of the results
The AI explains the computed results in plain language — with the participant’s consent. Every conclusion traces back to the data, carries a confidence level, and comes with a “what must not be inferred” section.
Tools
What ordinary questionnaires don’t have
16×16 intertype relations matrix
256 relationship pairs between types — each with its strengths, risks, and smoothing techniques. The compatibility of a pair or an entire team is visible on one screen.
comfortableneutraldifficult
Group morphology
The quartet’s form — 35 canonical variants — Reinin traits, and the strengths and weaknesses of the lineup. A deterministic calculation with stated grounds — analysis of structure, not judgment of people.
reproducible calculationAuto assembly plans
The system searches through lineups and proposes a plan for the goal — with coverage, the remainder of unassigned people, and a score for every fully typed quartet.
Group portfolios
Rehearse a reorganization: lineup snapshots, reshuffle scenarios, and side-by-side comparison of options — before touching real teams.
AI bundle per participant
Test cards, an integrated profile, and targeted explanations — in a single run. Each with its own evidence matrix.
Report center
Dozens of personal PDFs are generated in the background and downloaded as a single archive — hand out results to the whole team in a minute.
Code-based access
Participants sign in with a personal code — zero passwords and accounts. One public link launches testing for an entire department.
Method
People stand behind the method — not just an algorithm
Automation speeds up the work but does not decide for the specialist: every profile can be confirmed by an expert conclusion. The final word stays with a person, not with the algorithm.
- Type identification is transparent: the source, method, and confidence are stated explicitly
- Every AI conclusion traces back to specific data
- Every report includes a “what must not be inferred” section
- Reports are working hypotheses, not HR decisions
Honest numbers
The numbers behind the method — not the marketing
We don’t show logos we don’t have. We show what the method is made of.
5
methodologies out of the box
190
questions across two questionnaires
256
relationship pairs in the matrix
30
Big Five personality facets
35
quartet forms in morphology
4
interface languages
16
types in group analytics
0
passwords for participants
Beta program
For the first teams — with the reasoning in the open
Sound familiar?
Strong people — weak team
Discussed, decided, dispersed — and a week later the same question is back on the table. It isn't the people — it's the combinations. Sparta shows exactly which links create the friction — and what to check at the next meeting.
- Meetings stall, decisions hang in the air
- A conflict smolders with no visible cause
- New lineup — same problems
Assemble a lineupon clear grounds.
Code-based testing, the 16×16 matrix, quartet plans for the goal, and AI explanations of results — in one workspace.
Already taking part? Sign in through your company’s link. Want to join the beta? Write to us: beta@sparta-t.app.